Correlation between unification and differentiation of anti-corruption regulation with regards to public officials

The subject of this research is critical analysis the differences and similarities anti-corruption measures established by legislation on corruption prevention in relation to different categories public officials. A comparison such positions held carried out. goal work consists assessment requirements, restrictions, prohibitions, obligations imposed various officials, as well determination whether they should be differentiated or unified. author examines impact unification differentiation upon development legislation, makes proposals improvement regulation. conclusion made that optimal mechanism for regulation based a combination with prevalence latter. need restrictions mechanisms their implementation substantiated peculiarities status category official. All amendments examined from perspective application requirement, any justified. acquired results allow formulating recommendations prevention. For systematization its appropriate regulation, offers an algorithm assessing substantive procedural